Questions, answered.

Yes. The professional hub links to a private registration form and expert submissions. Credentials are self-reported until checked. Registration never grants access to patient documents or creates a clinical or legal service relationship.

No. You can share access experiences without documents or a diagnosis. Seek care for genuine health needs, not campaign paperwork. A diagnosis does not establish that cannabis is appropriate treatment or guarantee authorisation.

No. The initiative is nonpartisan and welcomes support, opposition, uncertainty and proposals for safeguards.

No. Participation can inform reviewed reports and appropriate submissions. It does not guarantee government action, a licence, medicine access, compensation or any particular outcome.

No. The petition has separate wording, agreement, approval and email verification. Survey consent is never used as petition agreement.

Raw responses are private. Public reporting uses reviewed aggregates, excludes free text and suppresses small groups. No identifiable medical experience is automatically published.

The public, patient, business and legal forms do not require a name or email. Expert follow-up and volunteer coordination require contact information. Free text can still identify you: avoid unnecessary personal details.

Keep your reference and private receipt. The privacy page lets you export your response or request withdrawal/deletion. Without that receipt, an anonymous response may not be safely identifiable. Contact the designated privacy contact for assistance once collection opens.

Collection remains closed until the privacy, security and operational review is approved. Patient access collection and petition signing have additional approval gates.

No. These are voluntary responses. Reports explain selection bias, coverage, sample size, dates and uncertainty; they do not estimate the opinions of all South Africans.

Do not put patient documents in general forms, email or social media. Optional patient proof has a separate, closed-by-default clinical review workflow: a reviewer must approve the minimum necessary extract before upload. It is not public. Expert attachments use a different restricted process.

English is the initial language. Additional translations require review by competent speakers before publication.

No authoritative documentation confirming a blanket suspension was established in this review. An individual delay or secondary report does not prove suspension of all authorisations. We will update this page if authoritative documentation is obtained.